Priority setting in health research in Cuba, 2010.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In public health systems, priority setting in health research determines resource allocation to produce evidence and proposals aimed at solving the population's health problems. In Cuba, the Science and Technical Division (S&T) of the Ministry of Public Health (MINSAP) leads this process, based on the country's health policy framework and consistent with optimal use of resources. To set health research priorities (HRPs) for 2010, a three-stage interpretive method was used involving 215 professionals working at all levels of the health system in 14 territories, 22 MINSAP experts, and academic administrators and health system managers at provincial and national levels. In Stage I, HRPs were identified and confirmed in each territory using a nominal group technique and ranked using the Hanlon Method. Further classification, ranking and ratification in Stages II and III resulted in a final set of five HRPs defined in the annual Request for Proposals from which projects are selected for funding. Results reflected consensus on the need to prioritize research on determinants of low risk perception and on program management. The participatory process laid the groundwork for conducting research better designed to contribute to solutions to major health problems affecting the Cuban population.
منابع مشابه
Priority Setting Meets Multiple Streams: A Match to Be Further Examined?; Comment on “Introducing New Priority Setting and Resource Allocation Processes in a Canadian Healthcare Organization: A Case Study Analysis Informed by Multiple Streams Theory”
With demand for health services continuing to grow as populations age and new technologies emerge to meet health needs, healthcare policy-makers are under constant pressure to set priorities, ie, to make choices about the health services that can and cannot be funded within available resources. In a recent paper, Smith et al apply an influential policy studies framework – Kingdon’s multiple str...
متن کاملShaping the Health Policy Agenda: The Case of Safe Motherhood Policy in Vietnam
Background Maternal health remains a central policy concern in Vietnam. With a commitment to achieving the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5 target of maternal mortality rate (MMR) of 70/100 000 by 2015, the Ministry of Health (MoH) issued the National Plan for Safe Motherhood (NPSM) 2003-2010. In 2008, reproductive health, including safe motherhood (SM) became a national health target progra...
متن کاملPriority Setting: Right Answer to a Far Too Narrow Question?; Comment on “Global Developments in Priority Setting in Health”
In their recent editorial, Baltussen and colleagues provide a concise summary of the prevailing discourse on priority-setting in health policy. Their perspective is entirely consistent with current practice, yet they unintentionally demonstrate the narrowness and moral precariousness of that discourse and practice. I respond with demonstrations of the importance of ‘interrogating scarcity’ in a...
متن کاملDoes the Narrative About the Use of Evidence in Priority Setting Vary Across Health Programs Within the Health Sector: A Case Study of 6 Programs in a Low-Income National Healthcare System
Background There is a growing body of literature on evidence-informed priority setting. However, the literature on the use of evidence when setting healthcare priorities in low-income countries (LICs), tends to treat the healthcare system (HCS) as a single unit, despite the existence of multiple programs within the HCS, some of whic...
متن کاملGlobal Developments in Priority Setting in Health
Countries around the world are experiencing an ever-increasing need to make choices in investments in health and healthcare. This makes it incumbent upon them to have formal processes in place to optimize the legitimacy of eventual decisions. There is now growing experience among countries of the implementation of stakeholder participation, and a developing convergence of methods to support dec...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- MEDICC review
دوره 12 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010